CO129-537-12 Status of step-children and adopted children 4-12-1931 - 22-3-1932 — Page 5

5

Thave never said that they should

In so regarded.

11.09

I feel

children

Jane

doubt whattion step- informally addplènd

children shoves

cantruction

109

h

on a strictly legal

regarded

し

and "daughters" (Saho.

I 149) for the prepon ym

The any legal

general mling

to

opinion seems to io that of M. Duncan

Jermy minute klow.

on

36794

which

was

prin for the

1.D.

purposes

of that

Care

only

Mr. Duncan

you should see.

M: Robarts-Wray.

My minute of 6/5/30 on 36794 (Gonsalus)

attacker was not a ruling or au

to the Effect that an

opinion

informally adopted

Child was, from the stricth, legal point of view, a child for the purposes of Col. Res.!!!!

All thad in mind was thear

wi the

particular circumstances of that case, there was no objection to the Sofs. Constring

One of his own regulations ui manner if he desired to do so.

a

lilmal

be the cricumstances tam not sure

(SEE NOI. on this file)

that it is necessay to to into the matter from f the strictt, legal point of view. All